[lkml]   [2009]   [Sep]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: tickless and HZ=1000 throughput advantage?
    On Sat, 19 Sep 2009 15:47:24 +0100
    Daniel J Blueman <> wrote:

    > On tickless kernels, is the general consensus that for non-embedded
    > systems, selecting HZ=1000 gives slightly more throughput in
    > particular situations than HZ=100 or 250, due to finer timer
    > intervals/granularity?

    it's not about throughput. It's about latency for some things....
    although now that select/poll and co use hrtimers it's not as critical

    the HZ timers aren't used much for anything time-critical nowadays.

    Arjan van de Ven Intel Open Source Technology Centre
    For development, discussion and tips for power savings,

     \ /
      Last update: 2009-09-19 16:57    [W:0.020 / U:20.396 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site