Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 14 Sep 2009 21:14:35 +0200 | Subject | Re: Phoronix CFS vs BFS bencharks | From | Marcin Letyns <> |
| |
2009/9/14 Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> > > On Mon, 2009-09-14 at 16:27 +0200, Marcin Letyns wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Disabling NEW_FAIR_SLEEPERS makes a lot of difference here in the > > Apache benchmark: > > > > 2.6.30.6-bfs: 7311.05 > > > > 2.6.30.6-cfs-fair_sl_disabled: 8249.17 > > > > 2.6.30.6-cfs-fair_sl_enabled: 4894.99 > > Wow. > > Some loads like wakeup preemption (mysql+oltp), and some hate it. This > load appears to REALLY hate it (as does volanomark, but that thing is > extremely overloaded). How many threads does that benchmark run > concurrently?
From the benchmark description:
This is a test of ab, which is the Apache Benchmark program. This test profile measures how many requests per second a given system can sustain when carrying out 500,000 requests with 100 requests being carried out concurrently. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |