lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Sep]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 5/6] thermal: Only set passive_delay for forced passive cooling
Date
Hi Matthew,

On Wednesday 26 August 2009, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 06:17:24PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> > Setting polling_delay is useless as passive_delay has priority,
> > so the value shown in proc isn't the actual polling delay. It
> > also gives the impression to the user that he can change the
> > polling interval through proc, while in fact he can't.
> >
> > Also, unset passive_delay when the forced passive trip point is
> > unbound to allow polling to be disabled.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>
> > Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>
> > Cc: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
>
> I'll look over this - I seem to remember having some reason to set
> that, but it escapes me now.

Have you had a chance to check this?

Cheers,
FJP


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-09-10 18:09    [W:0.163 / U:0.144 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site