lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Aug]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: linux-arm-kernel useless for development (was Re: Your message to Linux-arm-kernel awaits moderator approval)
On Thu 2009-08-06 06:02:10, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-08-06 at 13:40 +0100, Russell King wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 05:59:01PM +0530, David John wrote:
> > > I think the basis of Pavel's complaint is that the ARM mailing list is
> > > difficult to work with for casual users who might want to forward say,
> > > a simple bug report.
> > If only it were as simple as that.
> []
> > I'm not willing to spend vast sums of money in
> > the legal domain to sort this issue out.
> > Neither am I willing to take a chance.
>
> What chances are those?
>
> > And no, moving the list outside the EU domain doesn't relieve any
> > of the lawful issues unless (as I understand the law) someone outside
> > the EU were to run the list. And people would have to independently
> > subscribe to it - I wouldn't be able to export the existing subscriber
> > list outside the EU.
>
> I suspect a vger based ARM list would not require you to "run" it.
>
> Perhaps you overestimate the value of the arm subscriber database
> as well as the work involved to subscribe to a list.
>
> Adding a "click this to subscribe to the new list" to the mailing
> list trailer would work reasonably well.

Actually, "subscribing" new vger list as a receiver for lakml should
do the trick... for even easier migration.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-08-08 12:45    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site