Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 8 Aug 2009 12:42:51 +0200 | From | Pavel Machek <> | Subject | Re: linux-arm-kernel useless for development (was Re: Your message to Linux-arm-kernel awaits moderator approval) |
| |
On Thu 2009-08-06 06:02:10, Joe Perches wrote: > On Thu, 2009-08-06 at 13:40 +0100, Russell King wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 05:59:01PM +0530, David John wrote: > > > I think the basis of Pavel's complaint is that the ARM mailing list is > > > difficult to work with for casual users who might want to forward say, > > > a simple bug report. > > If only it were as simple as that. > [] > > I'm not willing to spend vast sums of money in > > the legal domain to sort this issue out. > > Neither am I willing to take a chance. > > What chances are those? > > > And no, moving the list outside the EU domain doesn't relieve any > > of the lawful issues unless (as I understand the law) someone outside > > the EU were to run the list. And people would have to independently > > subscribe to it - I wouldn't be able to export the existing subscriber > > list outside the EU. > > I suspect a vger based ARM list would not require you to "run" it. > > Perhaps you overestimate the value of the arm subscriber database > as well as the work involved to subscribe to a list. > > Adding a "click this to subscribe to the new list" to the mailing > list trailer would work reasonably well.
Actually, "subscribing" new vger list as a receiver for lakml should do the trick... for even easier migration. Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
| |