Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 06 Aug 2009 17:04:17 +0800 | From | Amerigo Wang <> | Subject | Re: [Patch 0/7] Implement crashkernel=auto |
| |
Eric W. Biederman wrote: > Hmm. I half take it back. How is crashkernel=auto and then shrinking > the reserved size better than the extended syntax Bernhard Walle > introduced nearly two years ago? >
You mean something like crashkernel=512M-2G:64M,2G-:128M? Isn't it longer and more complex than "crashkernel=auto" for an end user?
Hmm, this makes me to think that "crashkernel=auto" can be a replacement for that extended syntax...
| |