Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 3 Aug 2009 08:16:08 +0200 | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/3] x86: Add 'percpu_read_stable()' interface for cacheable accesses |
| |
* H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> wrote:
> Ingo Molnar wrote: >> * Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> wrote: >> >>> H. Peter Anvin wrote: >>>> Tejun Heo wrote: >>>>> Ingo, these patches might as well go through x86 tree. If you think >>>>> that would be better, please let me know. >>>>> >>>> Makes sense to me. I'll pull them into x86/percpu. >>> Cool, dropping from my tree then. >> >> We can delegate the contents of x86/percpu to you (the topic branch >> contains no patches over mainline right now) - i.e. we can pull those >> bits from you and they could also be in your tree to keep your testing >> & integration consistent. >> > > I just pushed out these branches into tip:x86/percpu.
Thanks! (I'll test it and push it out into -tip:master.)
> [...] We can zap those if there is a tree head you'd rather use.
It's fine this way i think.
Tejun: in the future you might want to offer up new x86-only bits based on tip:x86/percpu as git pulls.
Ingo
| |