lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Aug]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
FromKOSAKI Motohiro <>
SubjectRe: [patch -mm v2] mm: introduce oom_adj_child
DateMon, 3 Aug 2009 21:19:58 +0900 (JST)
> On Mon, 3 Aug 2009 17:45:19 +0900
> KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
>
> > "just inherit at fork, change at exec" is an usual manner, I think.
> > If oom_adj_exec rather than oom_adj_child, I won't complain, more.
> >
> But this/(and yours) requires users to rewrite their apps.
> Then, breaks current API.
> please fight with other guardians.

Definitely, I never agree regressionful ABI change ;)
At least, I still think it can be fixable.






\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-08-03 14:23    [from the cache]
©2003-2010