Messages in this thread |  | | | From | KOSAKI Motohiro <> | | Subject | Re: [patch -mm v2] mm: introduce oom_adj_child | | Date | Mon, 3 Aug 2009 21:19:58 +0900 (JST) |
| |
> On Mon, 3 Aug 2009 17:45:19 +0900 > KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote: > > > "just inherit at fork, change at exec" is an usual manner, I think. > > If oom_adj_exec rather than oom_adj_child, I won't complain, more. > > > But this/(and yours) requires users to rewrite their apps. > Then, breaks current API. > please fight with other guardians.
Definitely, I never agree regressionful ABI change ;) At least, I still think it can be fixable.
|  |