lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Aug]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/3] Add walltime support for ring-buffer
    Date
    > 
    > * KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
    >
    > > It can. but I don't think it is sufficient. On flight recorder
    > > use-case, The tracing run more than one year. And, Administrator
    > > only see last N sec log. (previous logs were overwritten by
    > > ring-buffer go-around)
    >
    > That's definitely something we want to enable ASAP.
    >
    > I'm wondering why a single u64 timestamp is not enough to express
    > the full, absolute range of time elapsed since bootup, in
    > nanoseconds.
    >
    > That would make walltime a matter of pretty-printing only - we'd
    > have to convert the u64 nsec timestamp into a walltime format,
    > right?
    >
    > In fact we could change all the timestamps to be standardized along
    > 'nanoseconds elapsed since 1970' or so - not nanoseconds since the
    > last bootup. That still fits just fine within 64 bits - u64
    > nanoseconds has a scope of 500+ years.

    Ah, you are right. thanks correct me.
    but I think ntp updating time storing is necessary too.





    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2009-08-03 11:35    [W:0.031 / U:0.252 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site