lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Aug]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable operation is possible
    On Sat 2009-08-29 15:22:06, Rob Landley wrote:
    > On Saturday 29 August 2009 05:05:58 Pavel Machek wrote:
    > > On Fri 2009-08-28 07:49:38, david@lang.hm wrote:
    > > > On Thu, 27 Aug 2009, Rob Landley wrote:
    > > >> Pavel's response was to attempt to document this. Not that journaling
    > > >> is _bad_, but that it doesn't protect against this class of problem.
    > > >
    > > > I don't think anyone is disagreeing with the statement that journaling
    > > > doesn't protect against this class of problems, but Pavel's statements
    > > > didn't say that. he stated that ext3 is more dangerous than ext2.
    > >
    > > Well, if you use 'common' fsck policy, ext3 _is_ more dangerous.
    >
    > The filesystem itself isn't more dangerous, but it may provide a false sense of
    > security when used on storage devices it wasn't designed for.

    Agreed.

    --
    (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
    (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2009-08-29 23:37    [W:0.021 / U:8.336 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site