lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Aug]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 00/11] SFI: Simple Firmware Interface - v3

* Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org> wrote:

>
> > Ok, this iteration is even nicer.
>
> Thank you, Ingo, both for the thoughtful review,
> and your kind words.
>
> > Reviewed-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
> >
> > A patch technical request/suggestion. I guess you'd like to keep
> > these bits in the ACPI tree, so that you can test it and merge it
> > with ongoing ACPI changes, right?
> >
> > That would be fine to me for all the arch/x86/ touching patches,
> > except for this one:
> >
> > [PATCH 05/11] ACPI, x86: expose some IO-APIC routines when CONFIG_ACPI=n
> >
> > I'd like to pick this one up into tip:x86/apic, because there's
> > ongoing work in this area. (also, by the looks of it, i'd not be
> > surprised if this patch needed some testing. This is fragile code
> > with quirky Kconfig dependencies.)
> >
> > I can create a standalone topic for this (based on .31-rc6),
> > containing this single commit, which you could pull into the ACPI
> > tree? That way we both can have this commit and nobody is held up,
> > and both trees can be pushed to Linus in the .32 merge window,
> > independently of each other.
>
> Sure.
>
> Go ahead and pull that patch onto an 2.6.31-rc8 based branch from here:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lenb/linux-sfi-2.6.git for-ingo
>
> As the previous patches did not depend on it, I simply rebased
> that one to rc8 and moved the other patches after it.

Pulled, thanks Len!

Ingo


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-08-29 09:37    [W:0.055 / U:0.592 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site