Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 26 Aug 2009 13:17:04 +0200 | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: WARNING: kmemcheck: Caught 32-bit read from uninitialized memory (f6f6e1a4), by kmemleak's scan_block() |
| |
* Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 12:34 PM, Ingo Molnar<mingo@elte.hu> wrote: > >> On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 12:28 PM, Catalin > >> Marinas<catalin.marinas@arm.com> wrote: > >> >> Does this look OK to you? > >> > > >> > For the kmemleak.c part: > >> > > >> > Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> > >> > >> Vegard? Ingo? The patch is based on tip/out-of-tree so it > >> probably should go to the kmemleak tree? > > > > I'm testing it currently - but yeah, i'd agree that it should go > > into the kmemleak tree, with a .32 merge date or so. > > Ingo/Vegard, ACK/NAK? I don't want my amazingly good patch to end > up in /dev/null so can we just shove it in kmemleak.git?
ack from me.
Ingo
| |