lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Aug]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [tip:timers/core] timekeeping: Increase granularity of read_persistent_clock()
Ingo Molnar writes:

> So i think this is much ado about nothing. Testing was done, the fix
> was applied immediately and no kitten was hurt in the process.

I agree.

I have a question though: I notice that you add cc's to patches that
get committed to the tip tree. Do you do that manually, or is it
automated?

And I have a request: when a patch touches architecture-specific code,
could you add a cc to the maintainer of that architecture?

Paul.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-08-26 02:29    [W:0.070 / U:0.348 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site