Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 26 Aug 2009 10:26:43 +1000 | From | Paul Mackerras <> | Subject | Re: [tip:timers/core] timekeeping: Increase granularity of read_persistent_clock() |
| |
Ingo Molnar writes:
> So i think this is much ado about nothing. Testing was done, the fix > was applied immediately and no kitten was hurt in the process.
I agree.
I have a question though: I notice that you add cc's to patches that get committed to the tip tree. Do you do that manually, or is it automated?
And I have a request: when a patch touches architecture-specific code, could you add a cc to the maintainer of that architecture?
Paul.
| |