Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Tue, 25 Aug 2009 09:37:16 -0400 | | From | Jason Baron <> | | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/4] add NR_syscalls define for x86 |
| |
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 07:05:32AM +0900, Paul Mundt wrote: > On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 05:40:14PM -0400, Jason Baron wrote: > > Add a NR_syscalls #define for x86. This is used in the syscall events tracing > > code. Todo: make it dynamic like x86_64 > > > > Signed-off-by: Jason Baron <jbaron@redhat.com> > > > > > > --- > > arch/x86/include/asm/unistd_32.h | 2 ++ > > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/unistd_32.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/unistd_32.h > > index 732a307..8deaada 100644 > > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/unistd_32.h > > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/unistd_32.h > > @@ -345,6 +345,8 @@ > > > > #ifdef __KERNEL__ > > > > +#define NR_syscalls 337 > > + > Syscalls start at 0 and end at 337, there are 338 syscalls, not 337. > Hence the off-by-1 that I initially reported. NR_syscalls is always the > last syscall + 1.
right, as I explained in my 0/4 message, this patch is for the -tip tree, where 337 is correct, and needs to be adjusted for the -next tree to 338.
thanks,
-Jason
|  |