lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Aug]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/4] add NR_syscalls define for x86
    On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 07:05:32AM +0900, Paul Mundt wrote:
    > On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 05:40:14PM -0400, Jason Baron wrote:
    > > Add a NR_syscalls #define for x86. This is used in the syscall events tracing
    > > code. Todo: make it dynamic like x86_64
    > >
    > > Signed-off-by: Jason Baron <jbaron@redhat.com>
    > >
    > >
    > > ---
    > > arch/x86/include/asm/unistd_32.h | 2 ++
    > > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
    > >
    > > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/unistd_32.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/unistd_32.h
    > > index 732a307..8deaada 100644
    > > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/unistd_32.h
    > > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/unistd_32.h
    > > @@ -345,6 +345,8 @@
    > >
    > > #ifdef __KERNEL__
    > >
    > > +#define NR_syscalls 337
    > > +
    > Syscalls start at 0 and end at 337, there are 338 syscalls, not 337.
    > Hence the off-by-1 that I initially reported. NR_syscalls is always the
    > last syscall + 1.

    right, as I explained in my 0/4 message, this patch is for the -tip tree,
    where 337 is correct, and needs to be adjusted for the -next tree to 338.

    thanks,

    -Jason



    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2009-08-25 15:43    [W:0.031 / U:0.464 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site