lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Aug]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/4] add NR_syscalls define for x86
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 07:05:32AM +0900, Paul Mundt wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 05:40:14PM -0400, Jason Baron wrote:
> > Add a NR_syscalls #define for x86. This is used in the syscall events tracing
> > code. Todo: make it dynamic like x86_64
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jason Baron <jbaron@redhat.com>
> >
> >
> > ---
> > arch/x86/include/asm/unistd_32.h | 2 ++
> > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/unistd_32.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/unistd_32.h
> > index 732a307..8deaada 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/unistd_32.h
> > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/unistd_32.h
> > @@ -345,6 +345,8 @@
> >
> > #ifdef __KERNEL__
> >
> > +#define NR_syscalls 337
> > +
> Syscalls start at 0 and end at 337, there are 338 syscalls, not 337.
> Hence the off-by-1 that I initially reported. NR_syscalls is always the
> last syscall + 1.

right, as I explained in my 0/4 message, this patch is for the -tip tree,
where 337 is correct, and needs to be adjusted for the -next tree to 338.

thanks,

-Jason



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-08-25 15:43    [W:0.124 / U:0.156 seconds]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site