[lkml]   [2009]   [Aug]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable operation is possible
> The papers show failures in "once a year" range. I have "twice a
> minute" failure scenario with flashdisks.
> Not sure how often "degraded raid5 breaks ext3 atomicity" would bite,
> but I bet it would be on "once a day" scale.

I agree it should be documented, but the ext3 atomicity issue is only
an issue on unexpected shutdown while the array is degraded. I surely
hope most people running raid5 are not seeing that level of unexpected
shutdown, let along in a degraded array,

If they are, the atomicity issue pretty strongly says they should not
be using raid5 in that environment. At least not for any filesystem I
know. Having writes to LBA n corrupt LBA n+128 as an example is
pretty hard to design around from a fs perspective.


 \ /
  Last update: 2009-08-24 23:15    [W:0.204 / U:7.076 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site