lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Aug]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [Patch 8/8] kexec: allow to shrink reserved memory
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 11:03:09AM +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
>On Fri, 21 Aug 2009 09:59:27 +0800
>Amerigo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 09:34:52AM +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
>> >On Thu, 20 Aug 2009 17:15:56 +0800
>> >Amerigo Wang <amwang@redhat.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> > The, problem is whether memmap is there or not. That's all.
>> >> > plz see init sequence and check there are memmap.
>> >> > If memory-for-crash is obtained via bootmem,
>> >> > Don't you try to free memory hole ?
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> It looks like that mem_map has 'struct page' for the reserved memory, I
>> >> checked my "early_node_map[] active PFN ranges" output, the reserved
>> >> memory area for crash kernel is right in one range. Am I missing
>> >> something here?
>> >>
>> >> I don't know why that oops comes out, maybe because of no PTE for thoese
>> >> pages?
>> >>
>> >Hmm ? Could you show me the code you use ?
>>
>> (Sorry that I reply to you with my gmail, my work email can't send out
>> this message, probably because one of the destinations is broken...
>> I am the same person, don't be confused. :-)
>>
>> Sure. Below is it:
>>
>> + for (addr = end + 1; addr < crashk_res.end; addr += PAGE_SIZE) {
>> + printk(KERN_DEBUG "PFN is valid? %d\n", pfn_valid(addr>>PAGE_SHIFT));
>> + ClearPageReserved(virt_to_page(addr));
>> + init_page_count(virt_to_page(addr));
>> + free_page(addr);
>> + totalram_pages++;
>> + }
>>
>>
>> pfn_valid() returns 1, and oops happens at ClearPageReserved().
>> ('addr' is right between crashk_res.start and crashk_res.end)
>
>Confused,
> if pfn_valid(addr >> PAGE_SHIFT) == true
>
>you should do
> ClearPageReserved(pfn_to_page(addr >> PAGE_SHIFT));
>
>because addr is physical address, not virtual.
>I guess crashk_res.end is physical address....

Excellent! You are right!

In fact, when I read the kexec code at the first time, I thought
'crashk_res' should hold physical address too, but after reading
more code I dropped that idea, so I am wrong. :-/

I will resend the whole patchset soon. It works now!

Thanks for your nice help, Hiroyuki!



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-08-21 04:49    [W:0.068 / U:0.132 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site