lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Aug]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
SubjectRe: Strange network timeouts w/ 2.6.30.5
From
Date
Walt Holman <walt@holmansrus.com> writes:

> dmesg is attached. This box does have >2GB Ram (6GB total). The dmesg
> will show e100 init'd 3 times since the first is the stock modprobe,
> 2nd was forced with use_io and the 3rd modprobe was after reverting
> the patch.

You most probably can't test without swiotlb (RAM has to be limited to
2 GB or so), can you? That would (dis)prove my theory. Alternatively (or
better), a test on IOMMU-equipped system would do.

Since swiotlb is x86-only thing (though other 64-bit archs may have
something similar), I think the correct work around is to enable the
"for_device" handoff on !X86.

Something like maybe:

Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Hałasa <khc@pm.waw.pl>

diff --git a/drivers/net/e100.c b/drivers/net/e100.c
index 014dfb6..b610088 100644
--- a/drivers/net/e100.c
+++ b/drivers/net/e100.c
@@ -1762,9 +1762,12 @@ static int e100_rx_indicate(struct nic *nic, struct rx *rx,

if (ioread8(&nic->csr->scb.status) & rus_no_res)
nic->ru_running = RU_SUSPENDED;
+#ifndef CONFIG_X86
+ /* FIXME interferes with swiotlb. */
pci_dma_sync_single_for_device(nic->pdev, rx->dma_addr,
sizeof(struct rfd),
PCI_DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
+#endif
return -ENODATA;
}

--
Krzysztof Halasa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-08-20 15:49    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans