[lkml]   [2009]   [Aug]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [ANNOUNCE] Reiserfs/kill-bkl tree v2
    On Sun, 2009-08-02 at 16:21 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
    > * Frederic Weisbecker <> wrote:
    > > > e.g. running all the file system stress tests from LTP would be
    > > > a good idea, ideally multiple at a time on a multi processor
    > > > system on a ram disk or perhaps AIM9.
    > >
    > > Yeah good idea. But again, I fear my laptop hasn't enough memory
    > > to support big enough ramdisks mount points to host selftests.
    > Well, dont waste too much time on it (beyond the due diligence
    > level) - Andi forgot that the right way to stress-test patches is to
    > get through the review process and then through the integration
    > trees which have far more test exposure than any single contributor
    > can test.
    > Patch submitters cannot possibly test every crazy possibility that
    > is out there - nor should they: it just doesnt scale. What we expect
    > people to do is to write clean patches, to test the bits on their
    > own boxes and submit them to lkml and address specific review
    > feedback.

    Is this the case for patches against drivers which the submitter doesn't
    have or can't get a hold of?


     \ /
      Last update: 2009-08-02 16:35    [W:0.041 / U:2.280 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site