Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 19 Aug 2009 10:13:57 +0300 | From | Avi Kivity <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v3 3/6] vbus: add a "vbus-proxy" bus model for vbus_driver objects |
| |
On 08/19/2009 09:40 AM, Gregory Haskins wrote: > > >>> So if I whip up a virtio-net backend for vbus with a PCI compliant >>> connector, you are happy? >>> >>> >> This doesn't improve virtio-net in any way. >> > Any why not? (Did you notice I said "PCI compliant", i.e. over virtio-pci) >
Because virtio-net will have gained nothing that it didn't have before.
>> virtio already supports this model; see lguest and s390. Transporting >> virtio over vbus and vbus over something else doesn't gain anything over >> directly transporting virtio over that something else. >> > This is not what I am advocating. > >
What are you advocating? As far as I can tell your virtio-vbus connector plus the vbus-kvm connector is just that.
-- I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this signature is too narrow to contain.
| |