lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Aug]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] applicom: Prevent unsigned wrap in ac_interrupt()
On 08/11/2009 10:54 AM, roel kluin wrote:
>>> unsigned i wraps if this occurs in the first iteration.
>>
>> Could you elaborate? I don't quite understand the point.
>
> `i' is unsigned. The last test in the loop is:
>
> if(readb(apbs[i].RamIO + RAM_IT_TO_PC)) {
> /* There's another int waiting on this card */
> spin_unlock(&apbs[i].mutex);
> i--;
> } else {
> spin_unlock(&apbs[i].mutex);
> }
>
> In the first iteration `i' is 0, so if this condition evaluates to true
> then `i' becomes 0xffffffff (since it's unsigned), the for loop test
> fails and the i++ never occurs.

Hmm, no. This is not how three `for' expressions are evaluated. The CFG
of "for (a; b; c) d;" is "a->(b->d->c)*". Read 6.8.5.3 of ANSI C99.

I.e. 0xff increments back to 0.

Am I still missing something?


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-08-11 14:57    [W:0.428 / U:0.028 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site