lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Jul]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: CONFIG_VFAT_FS_DUALNAMES regressions
Date
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> writes:

> Sure and I'd say the technical issues are simple
>
> - Tridge's patch breaks stuff
> - Tridge's patch masquerades as vfat but isn't.
>
> We can fix those by only creating short names (but honouring existing
> long ones) and by not claiming its vfat.

As technical stand, I agree with this approach. And my poor brain can't
consider other than technical thing, it is purely my problem though. So
I'll try to create the patch based on first version, and I'll apply it
instead.

And could you please stop talking about other than technical issues? My
poor brain is already overflowed.

I'm a fool? Yes, I agree.

Thanks.
--
OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-07-09 06:57    [W:0.482 / U:0.192 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site