lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Jul]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [rfc][patch 4/4] fs: tmpfs, ext2 use new truncate
On Wed 08-07-09 08:53:27, Nick Piggin wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 12:38:29PM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > @@ -68,7 +70,7 @@ void ext2_delete_inode (struct inode * i
> > >
> > > inode->i_size = 0;
> > > if (inode->i_blocks)
> > > - ext2_truncate (inode);
> > > + ext2_truncate_blocks(inode, 0);
> > > ext2_free_inode (inode);
> > >
> > > return;
> >
> > > -void ext2_truncate(struct inode *inode)
> > > +static void ext2_truncate_blocks(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset)
> > > {
> > > __le32 *i_data = EXT2_I(inode)->i_data;
> > > struct ext2_inode_info *ei = EXT2_I(inode);
> > > @@ -1032,27 +1074,8 @@ void ext2_truncate(struct inode *inode)
> > > int n;
> > > long iblock;
> > > unsigned blocksize;
> > > -
> > > - if (!(S_ISREG(inode->i_mode) || S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode) ||
> > > - S_ISLNK(inode->i_mode)))
> > > - return;
> > > - if (ext2_inode_is_fast_symlink(inode))
> > > - return;
> > > - if (IS_APPEND(inode) || IS_IMMUTABLE(inode))
> > > - return;
> > > -
> >
> > We can't move this to the caller easily. ext2_delete_inode gets
> > called for all inodes, but we only want to go on truncating for the
> > limited set that passes this check.
>
> Hmm, shouldn't they have no ->i_blocks in that case?
Not necessarily. Inode can have extended attributes set and those can
be stored in a special block which is accounted in i_blocks.

Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-07-08 13:17    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans