lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Jul]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: >10% performance degradation since 2.6.18
> for networking, especially for incoming data such as new connections,
> that isn't the case.. that's more or less randomly (well hash based)
> distributed.

Ok. Still binding them all to a single CPU all is quite dumb. It
makes MSI-X quite useless and probably even harmful.

We don't default to socket power saving for normal scheduling either,
but only when you specify a special knob. I don't see why interrupts
should be different.

-Andi

--
ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-07-04 10:49    [W:0.216 / U:0.780 seconds]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site