Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Fri, 3 Jul 2009 23:04:08 -0700 | | From | Arjan van de Ven <> | | Subject | Re: >10% performance degradation since 2.6.18 |
On Sat, 4 Jul 2009 01:35:05 +0200 Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> wrote:
> > ... so that you can't do power management on a per socket basis? > > hardly a good idea. > > Interrupts should only happen when the socket did spent time > submitting the work for them. Typically on drivers I'm familiar with > the return MSI is tied to the CPU that did submit the work item
for networking, especially for incoming data such as new connections, that isn't the case.. that's more or less randomly (well hash based) distributed.
-- Arjan van de Ven Intel Open Source Technology Centre For development, discussion and tips for power savings, visit http://www.lesswatts.org
|  |