Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 3 Jul 2009 11:36:36 -0300 | From | Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH -tip] perf tools: gitignore *.data |
| |
Em Fri, Jul 03, 2009 at 03:18:24PM +0200, Ingo Molnar escreveu: > > * Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Fri, Jul 03, 2009 at 12:38:52PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > > > * Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@kernel.org> wrote: > > > > > > > perf.data made by perf record is a data file and need to be > > > > ignored by git > > > > > > > > Added *.data so that perf.data and its friends will be ignored. > > > > > > > cscope* > > > > +*.data > > > > > > ok, this is something i wanted to revisit eventually - the > > > 'perf.data' name sucks a bit - as .data postfix is quite unspecific. > > > > > > Perhaps trace.perf is a better default name, and all files would > > > have the .perf postfix? > > > > > > I've Cc:-ed a number of folks who might have an opinion about this - > > > what would be the best default naming and postfix for perf binary > > > files? > > > > > > Ingo > > > > perf.bin seems to me adequate as it tells everything (IMHO). > > hm, .bin is pretty overloaded as well. It also suggests a > 'executable binary' in a certain way - which it isnt.
.samples .perf .perf_samples .ps - oops, also used ;-)
- Arnaldo
| |