[lkml]   [2009]   [Jul]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: fanotify - overall design before I start sending patches
    On Mon, 2009-07-27 at 20:23 +0100, Jamie Lokier wrote:
    > Andreas Dilger wrote:
    > > On Jul 25, 2009 01:29 +0100, Jamie Lokier wrote:
    > > > Eric Paris wrote:

    > What's wrong with fanotify-using applications generating events when
    > they modify files themselves?
    > An example was given where app A gets an event and modifies the file,
    > then app B gets an event and modifies the file, and app A... cycling.

    No the example was the 'open' which the kernel does on behalf of the
    listener. I'm thinking now I should only exclude


    as those are the only 3 event types I can see deadlock/recursion
    problems with.

     \ /
      Last update: 2009-07-29 22:21    [W:0.019 / U:104.712 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site