Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | Robert Richter <> | Subject | [PATCH 04/26] x86/oprofile: Fix usage of NUM_CONTROLS/NUM_COUNTERS macros | Date | Tue, 28 Jul 2009 19:07:04 +0200 |
| |
Use the corresponding macros when iterating over counter and control registers. Since NUM_CONTROLS and NUM_COUNTERS are equal for AMD cpus the fix is more a cosmetical change.
Signed-off-by: Robert Richter <robert.richter@amd.com> --- arch/x86/oprofile/op_model_amd.c | 4 ++-- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/oprofile/op_model_amd.c b/arch/x86/oprofile/op_model_amd.c index fdbed3a..dcfd450 100644 --- a/arch/x86/oprofile/op_model_amd.c +++ b/arch/x86/oprofile/op_model_amd.c @@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ static void op_amd_fill_in_addresses(struct op_msrs * const msrs) #ifdef CONFIG_OPROFILE_EVENT_MULTIPLEX for (i = 0; i < NUM_VIRT_COUNTERS; i++) { - int hw_counter = i % NUM_CONTROLS; + int hw_counter = i % NUM_COUNTERS; if (reserve_perfctr_nmi(MSR_K7_PERFCTR0 + i)) msrs->multiplex[i].addr = MSR_K7_PERFCTR0 + hw_counter; else @@ -366,7 +366,7 @@ static void op_amd_shutdown(struct op_msrs const * const msrs) if (msrs->counters[i].addr) release_perfctr_nmi(MSR_K7_PERFCTR0 + i); } - for (i = 0; i < NUM_COUNTERS; ++i) { + for (i = 0; i < NUM_CONTROLS; ++i) { if (msrs->controls[i].addr) release_evntsel_nmi(MSR_K7_EVNTSEL0 + i); } -- 1.6.3.3
| |