lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Jul]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH V2] au1xmmc: dev_pm_ops conversion
    Date
    On Sunday 26 July 2009, Mark Brown wrote:
    > On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 09:39:30PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
    >
    > > Yes, they would. In general, you'd probably want to do something like this:
    >
    > > static struct dev_pm_ops au1xmmc_pmops = {
    > > .resume = au1xmmc_resume,
    > > .suspend = au1xmmc_suspend,
    > > .freeze = au1xmmc_resume,
    > > .thaw = au1xmmc_suspend,
    >
    > I'd have expected freeze and thaw to be the other way around here?

    Sure, sorry.

    .suspend() corresponds to .freeze() and .poweroff(), while .resume()
    corresponds to .thaw() and .restore().

    Best,
    Rafael


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2009-07-26 21:39    [W:0.021 / U:38.080 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site