[lkml]   [2009]   [Jul]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH V2] au1xmmc: dev_pm_ops conversion
    On Saturday 25 July 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
    > > > > Was suspend to disk tested? It requires freeze()/thaw().
    > > >
    > > > Is that a regression introduced by this patch then? If so, many
    > > > more of the recent dev_pm_ops conversion patches would need to be
    > > > revisited.
    > Yes, they would.  In general, you'd probably want to do something like
    > this:
    > static struct dev_pm_ops au1xmmc_pmops = {
    >         .resume         = au1xmmc_resume,
    >         .suspend                = au1xmmc_suspend,
    >         .freeze         = au1xmmc_resume,
    >         .thaw           = au1xmmc_suspend,
    >         .restore                = au1xmmc_resume,
    >         .poweroff       = au1xmmc_suspend,
    > };
    > but in this particular case it's probably better to define separate
    > callbacks for .freeze() and .thaw() at least.
    > During hibernation we call .freeze() and .thaw() before and after
    > creating the image, respectively, and then .poweroff() is called right
    > after the image has been saved.  During resume .freeze() is called
    > after the image has been loaded and before the control goes to the
    > image kernel, which then calls .restore().

    Yes, I see that in drivers/base/platform.c (legacy) .suspend resp. .resume
    also got called for those cases?
    Ouch :-(

    I've added others who've submitted dev_pm_ops patches in CC.

    > I'll fix up the floppy and hp-wmi patches.

    Note that those are already in mainline, as is pcspkr.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2009-07-25 22:23    [W:0.023 / U:11.028 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site