Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 24 Jul 2009 11:22:32 -0400 | From | Mathieu Desnoyers <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH RFC -tip 2/4] Renamings to increase RCU clarity |
| |
* Paul E. McKenney (paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote: > Make RCU-sched, RCU-bh, and RCU-preempt be underlying implementations, > with "RCU" defined in terms of one of the three. Update the outdated > rcu_qsctr_inc() names, as these functions no longer increment anything.
Sounds good, as long as RCU-sched can still be accessed directly for tracing purpose (which seems to be the case here).
Thanks,
Mathieu
> > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > ---
[...]
-- Mathieu Desnoyers OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68
| |