Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 24 Jul 2009 11:02:28 +0800 | From | Li Zefan <> | Subject | Re: [RFC][PATCH] flexible array implementation v4 |
| |
Dave Hansen wrote: > Remaining issues: > - How should we deal with out-of-range indexes, especially > in flex_array_get() which returns void*? ERR_PTR()? > BUG_ON()? return NULL (current behavior)? > - Should care be taken not to allow a flex_array_get() to > an index where no flex_array_put() was done? > - Should we decay further than just packing things into the > 'base' page? Should we actually kmalloc() less than a > page at times when it will fit? >
I sugguest find some candidate users and see how this flex_array fits them.
| |