[lkml]   [2009]   [Jul]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/2] ZERO PAGE again v4.
    On Thu, 23 Jul 2009 09:33:34 +0900
    KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <> wrote:

    > BTW, when I post new version, should I send a reply to old version to say
    > "this version is obsolete" ? Can it make your work easier ? like following.
    > Re:[PATCH][Obsolete] new version weill come (Was.....)
    > I tend to update patches until v5 or more until merged.

    Usually it's pretty clear when a new patch or patch series is going to
    be sent. I think that simply resending it all is OK.

    I don't pay much attention to the "version N" info either - it can be
    unreliable and not everyone does it and chronological ordering works OK
    for this.

    Very occasionally I'll merge a patch and then discover a later version
    further down through the backlog. But that's OK - I'll just update the
    patch. Plus I'm not usually stuck this far in the past.

    (I'm still trying to find half a day to read "Per-bdi writeback flusher
    threads v12")

     \ /
      Last update: 2009-07-23 02:51    [W:0.021 / U:16.140 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site