[lkml]   [2009]   [Jul]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/2] ZERO PAGE again v4.
On Thu, 23 Jul 2009 09:33:34 +0900
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <> wrote:

> BTW, when I post new version, should I send a reply to old version to say
> "this version is obsolete" ? Can it make your work easier ? like following.
> Re:[PATCH][Obsolete] new version weill come (Was.....)
> I tend to update patches until v5 or more until merged.

Usually it's pretty clear when a new patch or patch series is going to
be sent. I think that simply resending it all is OK.

I don't pay much attention to the "version N" info either - it can be
unreliable and not everyone does it and chronological ordering works OK
for this.

Very occasionally I'll merge a patch and then discover a later version
further down through the backlog. But that's OK - I'll just update the
patch. Plus I'm not usually stuck this far in the past.

(I'm still trying to find half a day to read "Per-bdi writeback flusher
threads v12")

 \ /
  Last update: 2009-07-23 02:51    [W:0.064 / U:1.420 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site