Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 15 Jul 2009 13:33:24 +0900 | From | KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <> | Subject | Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] Memory controller soft limit patches (v9) |
| |
On Wed, 15 Jul 2009 09:38:11 +0530 Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> * Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com> [2009-07-10 18:29:50]: > > > > > From: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > > > > New Feature: Soft limits for memory resource controller. > > > > Here is v9 of the new soft limit implementation. Soft limits is a new feature > > for the memory resource controller, something similar has existed in the > > group scheduler in the form of shares. The CPU controllers interpretation > > of shares is very different though. > > > > If there are no objections to these patches, could we pick them up for > testing in mmotm. >
If any, will be fixed up in mmotm. About behavior, I don't have more things than I've said. (dealying kswapd is not very good.)
But plz discuss with Vladislav Buzov about implementation details of [2..3/5]. == [PATCH 1/2] Resource usage threshold notification addition to res_counter (v3)
It seems there are multiple functionalities you can shere with them.
- hierarchical threshold check - callback or notify agaisnt threshold. etc..
I'm very happy if all messy things around res_counter+hierarchy are sorted out before diving into melting pot. I hope both of you have nice interfaces and keep res_counter neat.
Thanks, -Kame
| |