lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Jul]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Input: add MAX7359 key switch controller driver, v2
From
Hi Marek,

On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 2:37 PM, Marek
Szyprowski<m.szyprowski@samsung.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Tuesday, July 14, 2009 10:25 AM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 08:28:05AM +0200, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
>> > Hello,
>> > On Tuesday, July 14, 2009 5:10 AM, Kim Kyuwon wrote:
>> > > Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
>> > > > On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 02:22:10PM +0530, Trilok Soni wrote:
>> > > >> I don't see this driver picked up yet in your -next branch. We should
>> > > >> target this driver to be mainlined in next merge window. This is very
>> > > >> important driver for some of the embedded systems, including palm pre
>> > > >> :)
>> > > > I was wondering if somebody could test the patch below and if it still
>> > > > works then I will apply to the next branch. Thanks!
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > > Dear Marek,
>> > >
>> > > Because I don't have the NCP board(which includes the max7359 keypad)
>> > > now, I can't test this patch. Marek, could you please test this patch?
>> >
>> > I would like to, but I could not find the base version to which I can apply
>> > that patch. I've tried v2 version posted in '[PATCH] Input: add MAX7359 key
>> > switch controller driver, v2' mail from Sat 2009-05-09 04:10 with 2 patches
>> > posted in replies to that main, but the latest patch still fails to apply.
>> >
>> > Could someone send me a complete patch, so I can do a test?
>> >
>>
>> Sending everything as attachments, maybe that will help...
>
> Ok. I've did the tests.
>
> MAX7359 keypad driver works after your patch, but reports much more events than
> the previous version. In this test I pressed quickly the first button on the
> keypad.
>
> Old version:
> NCP:~# hexdump /dev/input/event0
> 0000000 0037 0000 e733 000b 0001 00e7 0001 0000
> 0000010 0037 0000 e748 000b 0000 0000 0000 0000
> 0000020 0037 0000 94e2 000d 0001 00e7 0000 0000
> 0000030 0037 0000 94f3 000d 0000 0000 0000 0000
>

Please use evtest instead. It will give better output atleast.

--
---Trilok Soni
http://triloksoni.wordpress.com
http://www.linkedin.com/in/triloksoni


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-07-14 11:13    [W:0.092 / U:0.200 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site