Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 13 Jul 2009 14:47:31 +0200 | Subject | Re: [RESEND] [PATCH] readahead:add blk_run_backing_dev | From | Ronald Moesbergen <> |
| |
2009/7/13 Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>: > On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 08:12:14PM +0800, Ronald Moesbergen wrote: >> 2009/7/10 Vladislav Bolkhovitin <vst@vlnb.net>: >> > >> > Vladislav Bolkhovitin, on 07/10/2009 12:43 PM wrote: >> >> >> >> Ronald Moesbergen, on 07/10/2009 10:32 AM wrote: >> >>>> >> >>>> I've also long ago noticed that reading data from block devices is >> >>>> slower >> >>>> than from files from mounted on those block devices file systems. Can >> >>>> anybody explain it? >> >>>> >> >>>> Looks like this is strangeness #2 which we uncovered in our tests (the >> >>>> first >> >>>> one was earlier in this thread why the context RA doesn't work with >> >>>> cooperative I/O threads as good as it should). >> >>>> >> >>>> Can you rerun the same 11 tests over a file on the file system, please? >> >>> >> >>> I'll see what I can do. Just te be sure: you want me to run >> >>> blockdev-perftest on a file on the OCFS2 filesystem which is mounted >> >>> on the client over iScsi, right? >> >> >> >> Yes, please. >> > >> > Forgot to mention that you should also configure your backend storage as a >> > big file on a file system (preferably, XFS) too, not as direct device, like >> > /dev/vg/db-master. >> >> Ok, here are the results: > > Ronald, thanks for the numbers!
You're welcome.
>> client kernel: 2.6.26-15lenny3 (debian) >> server kernel: 2.6.29.5 with readahead patch > > Do you mean the context readahead patch?
No, I meant the blk_run_backing_dev patch. The patchnames are confusing, I'll be sure to clarify them from now on.
Ronald.
| |