[lkml]   [2009]   [Jul]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: sk_lock: inconsistent {RECLAIM_FS-ON-W} -> {IN-RECLAIM_FS-W} usage
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 04:00:17PM +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> The (sk_allocation & ~__GFP_WAIT) cases should be rare, but I guess
> the networking code shall do it anyway, because sk_allocation defaults
> to GFP_KERNEL. It seems that currently the networking code simply uses
> a lot of GFP_ATOMIC, do they really mean "I cannot sleep"?

Yep because they're done from softirq context.

Visit Openswan at
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <>
Home Page:
PGP Key:

 \ /
  Last update: 2009-07-10 10:05    [W:0.064 / U:0.028 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site