[lkml]   [2009]   [Jul]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: sk_lock: inconsistent {RECLAIM_FS-ON-W} -> {IN-RECLAIM_FS-W} usage
    On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 04:00:17PM +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote:
    > The (sk_allocation & ~__GFP_WAIT) cases should be rare, but I guess
    > the networking code shall do it anyway, because sk_allocation defaults
    > to GFP_KERNEL. It seems that currently the networking code simply uses
    > a lot of GFP_ATOMIC, do they really mean "I cannot sleep"?

    Yep because they're done from softirq context.

    Visit Openswan at
    Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <>
    Home Page:
    PGP Key:

     \ /
      Last update: 2009-07-10 10:05    [W:3.457 / U:0.328 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site