lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Jul]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] Added CONFIG_VFAT_FS_DUALNAMES option
    >  > Agreed 100%. I'm also not sure it should be called "vfat" when operating
    > > in this mode as it's not vfat any more - it needs a new name.
    >
    > If the code differed significantly between the two implementations I'd
    > probably agree, but as the two are extremely close I think maintaining
    > a separate filesystem isn't worth it.

    It needs a different name to the user. If the new fs isn't vfat (which it
    isn't) and doubly so if it can crash Windows XP at random on very rare
    occasions then users need to know its different.

    Imagine someone sticks a Linux written disk into a mission critical
    windows server - I think they have a right to know and not accidentally
    wander into a situation where they bring that box down ?

    mount -o vfat should fail for this non-vfat.



    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2009-07-01 13:37    [W:0.019 / U:32.868 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site