lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Jun]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] x86: clean up vdso-layout.lds.S
    Sam Ravnborg wrote:
    >>
    >>> Why do we need *(.data .data.*) rather than *(.data*)?
    >>> *(.dynbss*)?
    >> I don't have any strong opinion here, but the former is exactly what the
    >> default linker script has.
    >
    > My general take on this is that we should know and deal with what the linker produces.
    > So if we only expect .data then .data.* could go into .broken so we catch it.
    >

    That will break if we change to per-function sections.

    -hpa


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2009-06-09 20:21    [W:0.022 / U:0.824 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site