lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Jun]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] x86: clean up vdso-layout.lds.S
Sam Ravnborg wrote:
>>
>>> Why do we need *(.data .data.*) rather than *(.data*)?
>>> *(.dynbss*)?
>> I don't have any strong opinion here, but the former is exactly what the
>> default linker script has.
>
> My general take on this is that we should know and deal with what the linker produces.
> So if we only expect .data then .data.* could go into .broken so we catch it.
>

That will break if we change to per-function sections.

-hpa


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-06-09 20:21    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site