lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Jun]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 00/32] VFS based Union Mount (V3)
On Tue, Jun 09, 2009 at 12:44:06AM +0200, Jan Rekorajski wrote:
> On Mon, 08 Jun 2009, Valerie Aurora wrote:
>
> > On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 02:54:19PM +0200, Jan Rekorajski wrote:
> > > On Mon, 18 May 2009, Jan Blunck wrote:
> > >
> > > > Here is another post of the VFS based union mount implementation.
> > >
> > > Is there any chance this will support NFS? I can union-mount tmpfs over
> >
> > NFS as the read-only layer ought to work. NFS as the read-write layer
> > is still up in the air.
>
> As I don't need rw NFS, i didn't even try that :)
>
> > > nfs mounted fs, but if I try to mount --union two NFS filesystems I
> > > always get -EBUSY on second mount on the same mountpoint.
> > >
> > > Something along these lines:
> > >
> > > doesn't matter if I use --union on first mount, the result is always the
> > > same.
> > >
> > > mount <--union> -t nfs server:/export/system /mnt
> > > OK
> > > mount --union -t nfs server:/export/profile /mnt
> > > mount.nfs: /mnt is busy or already mounted
> > >
> > > I patched mount.nfs so it knows about MS_UNION, and strace shows me that
> > > it passes that flag to kernel.
> >
> > FYI, using --union on the first mount will make it union with the
> > local directory below it. The --union option is not needed when you
> > mount the lower read-only layer.
>
> Thanks for clarification.
>
> > You'll get -EBUSY on the second mount of any NFS file system over
> > another - try it again with the --union flag. Support for NFS on NFS
> > union mount would have to change this.
>
> I did just that, --union didn't change standard NFS behaviour.

Er, excuse me - I mean to type "try it again WITHOUT the --union
flag." My apologies!

>
> mount -t nfs server:/export/system /mnt
> mount --union -t nfs server:/export/profile /mnt
> mount.nfs: /mnt is busy or already mounted
>
> I did an experiment by using different IP of the server (same machine)
> when mounting the second fs, mount worked then, but 'ls -1 /mnt' oopsed.
> I can reproduce this and send you the oops next week.

Interesting! Does this happen without the --union flag?

-VAL


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-06-09 00:51    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans