Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 8 Jun 2009 15:07:43 -0700 | From | Andrew Morton <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v3] printk: add halt_delay parameter for printk delay in halt phase |
| |
On Tue, 9 Jun 2009 00:02:53 +0200 Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
> The /proc thing definitely makes sense - the boot option was just > symmetry to the existing boot-delay approach.
ok. btw, if we do decide to go with a general printk_delay then we'll need a touch_nmi_watchdog() in there to keep the NMI watchdog and softlockup detector away.
| |