[lkml]   [2009]   [Jun]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [tpmdd-devel] TPM drivers support and Linux Integrity Module for 2.6.30
    On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 01:02:27PM -0300, Rajiv Andrade wrote:
    > Yep, sorry. Two options:
    > 1- Inside that check, if got an error when in that particular
    > tpm_getcap() stacked call, consider that it might be this iTPM, and
    > bypass it just to get the value from the chip (would happen only once) -
    > Would work, but it's odd.
    > 2- Forget manufacturer_id and base the decision on the PNP_ID as david
    > suggested. I previously considered it but since it would end up in
    > modifying tpm_tis_init() prototype (struct device * to struct pnp_dev *)
    > and then wouldn't work when loading as a module with force option on, so
    > I moved to the manufacturer_id approach.
    > I'll get back to #2 meanwhile and post the patch, seems not hard to
    > accomplish though..

    I've got a set of patches that seem to resolve my iTPM woes. I've
    mostly tested on T400 but I also tried X200.

    I'll send the patches as a separate thread (unfortunately I can't get
    git-send-email to set a in-reply-to header on 0/5 without also
    breaking threading on x/5.)


     \ /
      Last update: 2009-07-01 03:33    [W:3.184 / U:0.020 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site