lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Jun]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateTue, 30 Jun 2009 15:21:12 +0200
FromPavel Machek <>
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/3] msm_sdcc: A few more cleanups
On Tue 2009-06-30 05:30:21, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-06-30 at 08:57 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/msm_sdcc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/msm_sdcc.c
> > - do_div(clks, NSECS_PER_SEC);
> > + do_div(clks, NSEC_PER_SEC);
>
> Compiling is good. Submitting uncompiled patches not so good...

:-) Thanks for doing the cleanups. You know, fixing two compile
problems is easy compared to cleanups you did.

Can you fold those two fixups to your patches, or how to proceed?

> > @@ -588,6 +588,8 @@ static void
> > msmsdcc_handle_irq_data(struct msmsdcc_host *host, struct mmc_data *data,
> > u32 status)
> > {
> > + void __iomem *base = host->base;
> > +
>
> I don't know how performance sensitive this is.
>
> Maybe it should be inline and have base passed
> as an argument.

I don't think it is _that_ performance critical.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-06-30 15:23    [from the cache]
©2003-2010