lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Jun]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    From
    Date
    SubjectRe: linux-next: Tree for June 3 (rfkill)
    On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 5:29 PM, Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> wrote:
    > On Wed, 2009-06-03 at 08:22 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
    >> Stephen Rothwell wrote:
    >
    >> CFG80211=y
    >> MAC80211=y
    >> RFKILL=m
    >>
    >> net/built-in.o: In function `cfg80211_netdev_notifier_call':
    >> core.c:(.text+0xa678b): undefined reference to `rfkill_blocked'
    >> net/built-in.o: In function `cfg80211_dev_free':
    >
    > Hrm. I thought
    >
    > config CFG80211
    >        tristate "Improved wireless configuration API"
    >        depends on RFKILL || !RFKILL
    >
    > would avoid that. Why doesn't it?
    >
    > johannes
    >

    Maybe the "y" state of CFG80211 specifically needs to depend on
    RFKILL=y || !RFKILL.

    BTW should CFG80211=y really be blocked when RFKILL=m? Shouldn't we
    just disable CFG80211 RFKILL support in this case (perhaps via a
    separate CONFIG_CFG80211_RFKILL automatically configured depending on
    CONFIG_RFKILL)?

    --
    Vista: [V]iruses, [I]ntruders, [S]pyware, [T]rojans and [A]dware. :-)
    --
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2009-06-03 18:17    [W:0.031 / U:29.984 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site