[lkml]   [2009]   [Jun]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] integrity: add ima_counts_put (updated)

    Mimi Zohar:
    > This suggestion has been mentioned before; and yes would definitely
    > resolve the annoying imbalance and iint_free() messages. But
    > incrementing/decrementing the pointers automatically each time a file is
    > opened/closed would defeat their purpose - alerting us that a file was
    > possibly not measured before being read/executed.

    I may be wrong since I don't fully understand IMA's purpose, but why did
    you create ima_counts_get() and make it call after dentry_open() in
    nfsd_open()? Isn't it same thing essentially?

    J. R. Okajima

     \ /
      Last update: 2009-06-29 22:39    [W:0.020 / U:13.576 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site