lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Jun]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] integrity: add ima_counts_put (updated)
Date

Mimi Zohar:
> This suggestion has been mentioned before; and yes would definitely
> resolve the annoying imbalance and iint_free() messages. But
> incrementing/decrementing the pointers automatically each time a file is
> opened/closed would defeat their purpose - alerting us that a file was
> possibly not measured before being read/executed.

I may be wrong since I don't fully understand IMA's purpose, but why did
you create ima_counts_get() and make it call after dentry_open() in
nfsd_open()? Isn't it same thing essentially?


J. R. Okajima


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-06-29 22:39    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans