Messages in this thread |  | | | Subject | Re: kmemleak suggestion (long message) | | From | Pekka Enberg <> | | Date | Fri, 26 Jun 2009 11:17:50 +0300 |
| |
Hi Sergey,
On (06/26/09 10:07), Pekka Enberg wrote: > > > This is not acceptable. > > > > > > Instead it should perhaps print _at most_ a single line every few > > > minutes, printing a summary about _how many_ leaked entries it > > > suspects, and should offer a /debug/mm/kmemleak style of file where > > > the entries can be read out from. > > > > Yup, makes tons of sense.
On Fri, 2009-06-26 at 11:14 +0300, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: > What do you about suggested ability to filter/block "unwanted" reports? > IMHO it makes sense.
Well, the thing is, I am not sure it's needed if we implement Ingo's suggestion. After all, syslog is no longer spammed very hard and you can do all the filtering in userspace when you read /debug/mm/kmemleak file, no?
Pekka
|  |