[lkml]   [2009]   [Jun]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [RFC][PATCH] mm: stop balance_dirty_pages doing too much work
    On Thu, Jun 25 2009, Al Boldi wrote:
    > Jens Axboe wrote:
    > > The test case is random mmap writes to files that have been laid out
    > > sequentially. So it's all seeks. The target drive is an SSD disk though,
    > > so it doesn't matter a whole lot (it's a good SSD).
    > Oh, SSD. What numbers do you get for normal disks?

    I haven't run this particular test on rotating storage. The type of
    drive should not matter a lot, I'm mostly interested in comparing
    vanilla and the writeback patches on identical workloads and storage.

    Jens Axboe

     \ /
      Last update: 2009-06-26 07:05    [W:0.021 / U:1.360 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site