[lkml]   [2009]   [Jun]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] allow execve'ing "/proc/self/exe" even if /proc is not mounted
    On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 3:26 PM, Mike Frysinger<> wrote:
    > On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 04:00, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
    >> On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 10:10 AM, Alan Cox wrote:
    >>>> With this patch, it is possible to execute /proc/self/exe
    >>>> even if /proc is not mounted. In the below example,
    >>>> ./sh is a static shell binary:
    >>> What if the user has procfs mounted somewherelse, what if they are in a
    >>> chroot where you don't want them to patch the binary and re-exec it ?
    >>> It would be far far cleaner for NOMMU to have a NOMMU private "reexec()"
    >>> call that didn't rely on procfs or hacking names into the kernel.
    >>> So NAK
    >> I am ok with it. Are other people ok with adding a syscall
    >> just for this purpose? Al?
    > please try a custom binfmt first

    I did not understand you.

     \ /
      Last update: 2009-06-27 00:59    [W:0.019 / U:4.348 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site