Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 26 Jun 2009 20:17:57 +0530 | Subject | Re: Kernel hard_start_xmit performance vs SOCK_RAW performance | From | Peter Chacko <> |
| |
Did you try using PACKET socket interface from your module ? (essentially as fast as hard-start-transmit() path ...there will be tools that can be used for this purpose....I am not sure of any such tool though...:-) you need to skip the scheduling (qdiscs) path also..
I think, Linux-net mailing list would be more appropriate to have this discussion.
Thanks, Peter
NetDiox computing systems Bangalore-india www.netdiox.com 080 2664 0708
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 8:05 PM, Gallus<gall.cwpl@gmail.com> wrote: > 2009/6/26 Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>: >> On Fri, 26 Jun 2009 16:04:04 +0200 >> Gallus <gall.cwpl@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> what path would you choose to rapidly generate packets >> >> Documentation/networking/pktgen.txt > > Thank you Alan for the answer. > > However, my goal is to generate packets with certain *content* in them. > > -- > Regards, > Gallus > please CC me > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |