lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Jun]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [patch] eventfd - revised interface and cleanups (2nd rev)
On Tue, 23 Jun 2009 14:34:50 -0700 (PDT)
Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> wrote:

> On Tue, 23 Jun 2009, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> > > Should functions be describing all the returned error codes, ala man pages?
> > >
> >
> > I think so.
>
> This becomes pretty painful when the function calls other functions, for
> which just relays the error code.
> Should we be just documenting the error codes introduced by the function
> code, and say that the function returns errors A, B, C plus all the ones
> returned by the called functions X, Y, Z?
> If not, it becomes hell in maintaining the comments...

Well. Don't worry about making rules. Taste and common sense apply. "Will
it be useful to readers if I explicitly document the return value". If
"yes" then document away. If "no" then don't.




\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-06-23 23:49    [W:1.684 / U:0.156 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site