lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Jun]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH 08/10] edac_core: Uses call_rcu() and its own wait_for_completion scheme.
Date
Module edac_core.ko uses call_rcu() callbacks in edac_device.c, edac_mc.c
and edac_pci.c.

They all uses a wait_for_completion scheme, but this scheme it not 100%
safe on multiple CPUs. See the _rcu_barrier() implementation which explains
why extra precausion is needed.

The patch adds a comment about rcu_barrier() and as a precausion calls
rcu_barrier(). A maintainer needs to look at removing the wait_for_completion
code.

Signed-off-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@comx.dk>
---

drivers/edac/edac_device.c | 5 +++++
drivers/edac/edac_mc.c | 5 +++++
drivers/edac/edac_pci.c | 5 +++++
3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/edac/edac_device.c b/drivers/edac/edac_device.c
index b02a6a6..5e831c9 100644
--- a/drivers/edac/edac_device.c
+++ b/drivers/edac/edac_device.c
@@ -373,6 +373,11 @@ static void del_edac_device_from_global_list(struct edac_device_ctl_info
init_completion(&edac_device->removal_complete);
call_rcu(&edac_device->rcu, complete_edac_device_list_del);
wait_for_completion(&edac_device->removal_complete);
+
+ /* hawk@comx.dk 2009-06-22: I think that rcu_barrier() should
+ * be used instead of wait_for_completion, because
+ * rcu_barrier() take multiple CPUs into account */
+ rcu_barrier();
}

/*
diff --git a/drivers/edac/edac_mc.c b/drivers/edac/edac_mc.c
index 335b7eb..edcce41 100644
--- a/drivers/edac/edac_mc.c
+++ b/drivers/edac/edac_mc.c
@@ -428,6 +428,11 @@ static void del_mc_from_global_list(struct mem_ctl_info *mci)
init_completion(&mci->complete);
call_rcu(&mci->rcu, complete_mc_list_del);
wait_for_completion(&mci->complete);
+
+ /* hawk@comx.dk 2009-06-22: I think that rcu_barrier() should
+ * be used instead of wait_for_completion, because
+ * rcu_barrier() take multiple CPUs into account */
+ rcu_barrier();
}

/**
diff --git a/drivers/edac/edac_pci.c b/drivers/edac/edac_pci.c
index 30b585b..d0eb8c9 100644
--- a/drivers/edac/edac_pci.c
+++ b/drivers/edac/edac_pci.c
@@ -188,6 +188,11 @@ static void del_edac_pci_from_global_list(struct edac_pci_ctl_info *pci)
init_completion(&pci->complete);
call_rcu(&pci->rcu, complete_edac_pci_list_del);
wait_for_completion(&pci->complete);
+
+ /* hawk@comx.dk 2009-06-22: I think that rcu_barrier() should
+ * be used instead of wait_for_completion, because
+ * rcu_barrier() take multiple CPUs into account */
+ rcu_barrier();
}

#if 0


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-06-23 17:35    [W:0.166 / U:0.056 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site