lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Jun]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] v5 RCU: the bloatwatch edition
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 11:32:08AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> >
> > > This patch is a version of RCU designed for (!SMP && EMBEDDED)
> > > provided as a proof of concept of a small-footprint RCU implementation.
> > > In particular, the implementation of synchronize_rcu() is extremely
> > > lightweight and high performance. It passes rcutorture testing in each
> > > of the four relevant configurations (combinations of NO_HZ and PREEMPT)
> > > on x86. This saves 1263 bytes compared to Classic RCU, and more than
> > > three kilobytes compared to Hierarchical RCU (updated to 2.6.30):
> >
> > On FRV:
> >
> > CONFIG_CLASSIC_RCU=y
> >
> > text data bss dec hex filename
> > 884 32 20 936 3a8 kernel/rcupdate.o
> > 2616 184 0 2800 af0 kernel/rcuclassic.o
> >
> > CONFIG_TREE_RCU=y
> >
> > text data bss dec hex filename
> > 884 32 20 936 3a8 kernel/rcupdate.o
> > 4068 384 0 4452 1164 kernel/rcutree.o
> >
> > CONFIG_TINY_RCU=y
> >
> > text data bss dec hex filename
> > 836 32 20 888 378 kernel/rcupdate.o
> > 816 24 0 840 348 kernel/rcutiny.o
> >
> > On MN10300:
> >
> > CONFIG_CLASSIC_RCU=y
> >
> > text data bss dec hex filename
> > 900 28 48 976 3d0 kernel/rcupdate.o
> > 1777 184 0 1961 7a9 kernel/rcuclassic.o
> >
> > CONFIG_TREE_RCU=y
> >
> > text data bss dec hex filename
> > 900 28 48 976 3d0 kernel/rcupdate.o
> > 2733 384 0 3117 c2d kernel/rcutree.o
> >
> > CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU=y
> >
> > text data bss dec hex filename
> > 961 28 48 1037 40d kernel/rcupdate.o
> > 3314 128 8 3450 d7a kernel/rcupreempt.o
> >
> > CONFIG_TINY_RCU=y
> >
> > text data bss dec hex filename
> > 865 28 48 941 3ad kernel/rcupdate.o
> > 500 24 0 524 20c kernel/rcutiny.o
> >
> > > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> >
> > Acked-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com
>
> Ok, that's more convincing than 900 bytes on x86.

It used to be 900 bytes. In 2.6.30, it is 1263 bytes. ;-)

That said, I agree that FRV and MN10300 savings are more impressive.

> Paul, i guess this is .32 material anyway, right?

I am personally OK with it being .32, as long as David Howells,
Lennert Buytenhek, and Paul Mundt are OK with that schedule.

> Since there's plenty of time, could we perhaps also do the
> classic-rcu removal and integrate-rcupreempt-into-tree-rcu steps, to
> reduce the (significant) config complexity perhaps?

Classic-RCU removal most certainly. I am hoping to get the
integrate-rcupreempt-into-tree-rcu piece done in .32 timeframe, but
there is a chance that it may be a bit later.

Thanx, Paul


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-06-23 15:01    [W:0.063 / U:0.568 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site